“Lots of people want to ride with you in the limo, but what you want is someone who will take the bus with you when the limo breaks down.” - Oprah Winfrey
9/10
review written by Andrei Sipos on the 13th of November 2010
Why is it that millions of people use Facebook every day, but a surprisingly small amount are interested in seeing a film revolving around the social networking site’s foundation and how it came to be what it is today? I myself have shown little interest about the upcoming movie
The Social Network, even after hearing that
David Fincher will be in charge of directing it. It’s quite puzzling why something like this would be lacking appeal, but one definite reason would be that a true story generally falls short when put to film because it lacks that sense of cinematic attraction that a work of fiction contains. There’s a fine line between trying to accurately depict true events on the big screen and mixing truth with fiction in order to create a movie that will appeal to the audience, and rarely do filmmakers successfully incorporate one or the other when faced with bringing a true story to life.
Based on the book
The Accidental Billionaires by
Ben Mezrich,
The Social Network tells the story of how Facebook came to be and how it became as big as it is today, but this isn’t your average run-of-the-mill real life story about great people achieving great things, but rather a close look into the lives of several individuals who helped bring the social networking site to life. As such, it’s more a character study involving themes such as friendship, trust, greed and betrayal than it is about the actual founding of Facebook. The truth is that we will never know how accurate it is (like many other films based on a true story), but that actually doesn’t matter too much.
Anyone even slightly familiar with David Fincher’s work knows that this isn’t the type of project that you would normally expect him to be attached to. Sure, he has proven himself to be quite versatile over the years, but
The Social Network is significantly different in vein from everything that he has directed thus far. The point is that it has raised concerns for some regarding Fincher being in charge of directing “the movie about Facebook” while others have gotten even more excited about the film when they got the news. I’m not quite sure how I felt about it at first, but it definitely changed my perspective on the entire project and shifted expectations to a whole new level – not a higher one, but not a lower one either.
The screenplay has been adapted for the big screen by
Aaron Sorkin, whose signature fast-paced dialogue and style of writing are most definitely present in this movie as well. Right from the very first scene—a sequence of around 10 minutes long depicting Mark Zuckerberg involved in a heated conversation with his soon-to-be ex-girlfriend—we get a good taste of how the film is going to play out and what it will be about. It’s a dialogue-driven movie, no doubt, and Sorkin’s influence is undeniable. Quick exchanges between characters and smart dialogue make for a smooth, yet rapid pace and keep the film entertaining from start to finish. Along with Fincher’s experienced direction and his unobstructed vision, who knows exactly how to shoot a scene and when to cut it, this makes for the perfect recipe of success.

Most of the film takes place at Harvard University, but the story is told in flashbacks as remembered by characters and mentioned in several depositions where Mark Zuckerberg is sued not only by fellow students who claim that he stole their idea, but also by his best friend. After breaking up with his girlfriend, Zuckerberg goes on the internet and writes an ugly article about her in his blog. In the same night, he creates a website called FaceMash with help from his best friend Eduardo Saverin, which ends up crashing Harvard’s network due high traffic. After being punished with six months of academic probation for his actions, Mark is brought to the attention of two brothers, also members of Harvard University, who offer him a job as a programmer for their new website. He has other plans, though, and those who come in his path may end up suffering greatly.
It’s important to understand that
The Social Network isn’t just a movie about the founding of Facebook, but also a film revolving around various themes and exploring the rising culture of the early 21st century. Going into this movie with false expectations may diminish its overall effect, so it’s doesn’t hurt to be aware that things may not turn out as anticipated. As usual, David Fincher does his best and it’s easy to identify his contribution to the film in every frame. Much like every other movie he’s directed, there’s a certain visual style associated with
The Social Network. Everything from the colour pallete he uses in certain scenes to the camera angles and the way characters interact with each other are there due to Fincher’s powerful and steadfast direction.
Much like every other dialogue-oriented film out there,
The Social Network wouldn’t be as effective with the terrific performances of its cast.
Jesse Eisenberg is truly impressive in the lead role of Mark Zuckerberg, and his past films where he played mostly quirky, awkward teenagers are long gone. He plays a completely different person here and together with Fincher’s fine direction he manages to really stand out as a capable actor. Then there’s
Andrew Garfield, the rising star that really proves why he is gaining reputation so quickly in the film industry. He does a tremendous job at playing his part and he delivers lines with ease and passion. Good things are bound to happen to him career-wise if he keeps it up.
Other roles include
Justin Timberlake as Sean Parker, the co-founder of Napster that gets in touch with Zuckerberg and ultimately becomes involved with Facebook. I had my doubts about Timberlaker only because I’m not too fond of singers turned actors, but he did a fine job as the confident, somewhat manipulative character that adds some spice during the final half of the film. Another noteworthy actor is
Armie Hammer, who actually plays two characters: Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss, who sue Mark Zuckerberg for stealing their idea for Facebook. It actually never occurred to me throughout the entire movie that the twins were actually played by the same person (I was surprised when I found out in the end), but that’s mainly due to Hammer’s versatility in playing to different personalities, which he does to perfection.
There is no doubt that there is some fiction included within this so-called true story, but
The Social Network wouldn’t have been as good or exciting had it mimicked reality in the most accurate way possible. In order for a film to work, there has to be some sort of cinematic fiction involved, and that’s exactly what this movie needed. The point is that it doesn’t really matter how much of it is true, because that’s not exactly the film’s goal or purpose. As a character study,
The Social Network is one of the best films to come along in quite a while, and even though audiences will end up hating the Mark Zuckerberg character, it’s only because Eisenberg played the part so well and Aaron Sorkin did his job at writing him in the most intriguing way possible. Still, I’m sure most of us will be able to sympathize with this fascinating character, even after all that he’s done throughout the film.
So is
The Social Network worth a watch? I don’t know about you, but for me this film deserves more than one watch simply because it’s so well put together, so beautifully shot and excellently acted. David Fincher proves that he is indeed an adaptable director able to take on any genre and do his magic in an unperturbed manner. I now realize that this film didn’t exactly turn out to be what I expected, yet it did somehow turn out to be just how I imagined it at the same time. Maybe that’s because
The Social Network is a lot of things, or possibly because I really didn’t know what to expect from it. As for the end result, it’s far better than I could have ever anticipated and it is no doubt one of my favourite films of the year. As for the facts, we’ll never really know how much of it is true and what exactly was made up. The only people that know that are the ones that have lived through it, and I’m sure they aren’t very eager to reveal the truth to the whole world.